
Elections
Your complete directory of Washington State candidates for Governor, United State Senator and Congress in the current election cycle ... state political parties ... the official state election office ... and state news sources.
Click here for more info:
http://www.politics1.com/wa.htm
Washington State Group leader/admin........................ Michael Pomper
Comment
Comment by Frank K. Ani, Jr. on May 24, 2012 at 6:39pm For those who live in or know fellow Patriots in King County Washington the county council voted 4 to 3 to extend ICLEI for another year.
Comment by Michael Pomper on April 23, 2011 at 11:03am
Comment by Michael Pomper on April 23, 2011 at 10:55am
Comment by Michael Pomper on April 23, 2011 at 9:40am Tell me what you think about our Governor, Senators, Representatives, etc...
Keep it clean. I know it's hard, but we are not Liberals after all. :)
Comment by Michael Pomper on April 23, 2011 at 8:59am The majority of States are broke, including the beautiful State of Washington. Our great country is broke, yet our Democrats in The House of Representatives and Senate have voted "NO" on a part of the budget bill on April 18th. 2011 that would have blocked funding for PP (Planned Parenthood).
During my recent blogging activities, it seems Liberals are trying to justify the Democrats argument that Planned Parenthood does not use Tax Payer funds for abortions, which happens to be PP's biggest contributor to their bottom line.
It's kind of amusing to hear the ridiculous arguments, but it's also very ignorant on the part of Liberals.
Liberals are saying that Planned Parenthood gets Tax Payer money for more essential services such as the well being of women who are planning to have their babies rather than having PP assist in the murder of those babies.
For anyone who runs across a Liberal..., friend, family or foe, who believes this nonsense, and can't seem to find the right words to explain to them that in fact, yes, PP does use Tax Payer funds to fund abortions, even if not directly, here is a way to explain it, using terms Liberals should be able to understand.
Planned Parenthood charges a certain amount of money for each abortion they commit. For those who cannot afford this service, funds are provided from other parts of PP's budget, or from part of the enormous fee's charged to those who can afford the service.
Now to put it in simple terms you can use to win an argument on this subject with a Liberal.
The Liberals argument: "Planned Parenthood does not use Tax Payer money for abortions. They use it for other services. Even if you audited PP, you wouldn't find Tax Payer funds being used for abortions. So there!"
OK, that sounds plausible, doesn't it? Sure, because if you do audit PP, it very well will show that the money taken from Tax Payers does not go directly to abortion services.
In terms Liberals should, but won't admit, they understand. Lets say you have a drug abuse problem. Your electric bill comes in and it's $500. All you have is $500 in your account. If you don't pay your electric bill, your power will be shut off tomorrow. You explain this to a friend and they offer to give you the $500 to pay your electric bill. You are ecstatic. You hide the fact that you already have $500, but now you will be able to pay your bill and feed your addiction.
You head out, stop at the power company and pay your bill. Now you still have $500, so you head over to your drug dealers house and purchase some drugs. Your friend finds this out and is furious with you for using the money they gave you for drugs. You explain that you only used your own money for the drugs, and the money they gave you went to pay the electric bill.
Even if you were to be given an audit, you really couldn't prove which $500 was used for the electric bill, and which $500 was used to buy drugs. However, your friend could not prove this either. To put in perspective, if you were not given the $500, you would not have been able to buy drugs after paying your bill. So even if the money given to you was used to pay the bill, you would not have been able to buy drugs if your friend did not give you money for the bill.
Just like Planned Parenthood. Without Tax Payer money, other services would lose out, but so would abortions. Because without Tax Payer funds, they would have to change their budget plan.
If not for those Tax dollars, other services would be getting the money from the biggest money maker for PP. Abortions, rather than Tax dollars. So even if the Tax fund do not go directly to abortions, that service would suffer a loss and free abortions would lose funding which would cut down on the number of abortions committed.
So don't be fooled by the Liberal argument that other "essential" services would be cut if Tax funds stopped. That would be the decision of the PP board of directors. Cut essential services, or cut abortions. It's their decision, not that of the Tax Payer being blamed.
Comment by Lee Johnson on July 30, 2010 at 11:37am
Comment by Lee Johnson on July 28, 2010 at 12:01am
Comment by Lee Johnson on July 23, 2010 at 3:33pm
Comment by Lee Johnson on July 18, 2010 at 3:39pm
Comment by Lee Johnson on July 11, 2010 at 1:10pm
© 2013 Created by Christian Jorgensen.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Washington State Group to add comments!