What’s extremely concerning, but not surprising about this issue?-You Decide:
The Government-Coordinated CHEMTRAIL Conspiracy Continues Unabated!-Posted on geoengineeringwatch.org-On January 28, 2014:
Vast Swaths Of America Now See Little Or No Sunlight; Massive Areas Under Continuous Chemical Assault
Originally posted at: StateoftheNation2012.com
Never in the history of the USA has anyone seen — and experienced — such a pervasive and ongoing chemical assault on the citizenry in broad daylight. Especially an assault that goes unseen and, therefore, unreported by the great majority of people who live under chemtrailed skies. These folks are by and large completely unaware that their skies are literally being saturated, sometimes 24/7, with chemtrail chemicals.
How is it that these chemicals being spewed by airliners, which are equipped to lay down such aerosolized chemical cocktails, go undetected by so many?
That is truly the $64,000 question?
And, there can be only one answer. The Federal Government has willfully engaged in a premeditated conspiracy to deceive the public. This conspiracy to both deceive and spray chemicals anywhere the government wishes has been going on for decades. Yet they continue to assert that the chemtrails which many of us have witnessed and experienced are actually contrails.
What follows are a few photos, which clearly show how the equipment which produces these aerosols, can start and stop the spraying process. Upon seeing these many chemtrails being laid down in real time, it is obvious to anyone who can see that they are in fact chemtrails … and positively not contrails. Contrails are the normal vapor trails which are left in the wake of a sky borne jet airliner. They appear at the very rear being ejected as the exhaust from the jet airliners, and dissipate quite quickly depending on the ambient atmospheric temperature, pressure and humidity at the time.
Photos of Chemtrails which cannot be Contrails
Hopefully you get the picture by now. If not, here’s a much more ‘exhaustive’ photo-documentary for your viewing: CHEMTRAILS: A Planetary Catastrophe Created by Geoengineering (UPDA...
These photos categorically portray the chemtrails being started and stopped at the will of the chemtrail aerosolization equipment operator. In other words, there is no room for debate here:Chemtrails are not contrails, and contrails are not chemtrails. The preceding photos ought to serve as irrefutable evidence for anyone who is confronted with the skepticism or disbelief from those who rarely look at the sky.
This Government-Run Chemtrail Conspiracy Has At Least Three Prongs
The first prong has been to knowingly disseminate false information about the multi-decade, government-coordinated,chemtrail program. Calling what are actually chemtrails contrails is a stratagem the government has used with great success for all of those decades. Except that now many are waking up to the truth and calling them on it whenever and wherever possible.
On those rare occasions where they trot out a willing dupe to purposefully misrepresent chemtrails as contrails, they often fall down on the job. Nevertheless, the government has so committed itself to this highly flawed strategy for so many years that they refuse to give it up. Their untenable approach is now beginning to work in the favor of those who are working to expose this relentless chemical assault against the populace.
The second prong of the government’s stratagem is to selectively spray uniquely formulated chemtrail aerosols in different areas, at different altitudes, during specific weather patterns, etc. For instance, we often see them heavily spray the skies one or two days before a predicted rainfall, thunderstorm, snowfall, hailstorm or any other type of precipitation event. This is without question thechemtrail program’s most predictable feature. When a major weather event is forecasted, the government’s chemtrail airliners are up there creating tic-tac-toe boards in the sky like at no other time.
This begs the following question: What on earth are they putting in those chemtrail brews that they are so deliberate to rain upon the masses? After all, the heavy precipitation events particularly ensures that the many aerosolized chemicals end up on lakes and rivers, farmland and forests, homes and offices, roads and sidewalks, malls and shopping centers, cars and trucks, etc. Just in case the reader has any health concerns or medical conditions which might be caused, or exacerbated, by the toxic chemicals present in chemtrails, here is a real eye-opener:
The third prong of this ubiquitous and unrelenting governmentchemtrail conspiracy is weather modification.
All one has to do is closely watch the unpredictable and uncooperative weather of the great state of California to get an appreciation of how profoundly geo-engineering has altered the long-established climatological patterns there. The state has been besieged by what may be its worst drought in recorded history. The headlines that follow tell the story much better than we can:
Satellite Photos Showing Pacific Storms Stopped Cold And Destroyed “H” stand for High Pressure System; Notice the unnatural L angle
The US Federal Government has been deceiving the citizenry for many decades regarding the geo-engineering chemical assault known as chemtrails. Not only has the government continued down this road of deception, it has ramped up its many and varied initiatives to ensure that the chemtrail genie does not escape from the bottle. Once it does, they know that it cannot be put back into the bottle … and that there will be many unhappy people as a result.
For the untold millions who have been systematically sickened by the covert chemtrail program, they will have their day of revelation and justice. Those who directly participated in this chemical assault on the entire nation will likewise face the appropriate consequences. It is now only a matter of time that both this crime against humanity and the subsequent cover-up will be exposed.
May those who are responsible for this crime against humanity be forewarned! The people of the world don’t like having their sunny days taken from them. Neither do they like being sprayed from on high with toxic and dangerous chemicals.
State of the Nation January 28, 2014 StateoftheNation2012.com
There will be those among the scientific establishment who will even attempt to explain away the chemtrail photos above as contrails. These folks are either intellectually challenged to the extreme. Or, they are paid shills in the employ of the various organs of government propaganda.
Particularly for anyone who is confronted by skeptics, let them see for themselves a chemtrail in the making over their own home or business. In every case they will witness firsthand the starting and the stopping of the chemtrails, depending on their vantage point. If this realtime execution of the chemtrail crime does not convince them, nothing can or will.
Remember, we live in a time when common sense has become quite rare. And, the human faculty of reason has fled the civilization … to a great degree.
Excellent Website Reference:
Main stream media”s facade of smoke and mirrors continues to hide the ongoing geoengineering programs from the awareness of the public at large. It is astounding how so many people can go along with the “official” narrative on geoengineering, while seemingly not recognizing the all to visible spraying going on above their heads day in and day out. The article below is a case in point. I have already sent a message to the author and the site inquiring as to why they are not acknowledging the well documented climate engineering programs that have been going on for 60 years or more.
Anytime an article like this surfaces, each and every one of us should take the time to contact the source. To tell them we want the truth, not more lies of omission and deception. Making such an effort is our duty to the common good, its up to all of us.
Dane Wigington, geoengineeringwatch.org
What Is Climate Geoengineering? Word Games in the Ongoing Debates Over a Definition
Climate geoengineering advocates have long argued over how to actually define the term “geoengineering.” The precise details of that definition are important for various reasons, not the least of which is that it will determine what likely is to be subjected to the scrutiny and potentially complex and difficult legal governance processes that such a global scale climate-tweak effort would necessarily involve.
Already, as of 2010, the Convention on Biological Diversity, a treaty that 193 UN member countries (all other than the Holy See, Andorra and the United States) have ratified, adopted a de-facto moratorium on climate geoengineering in 2010. That was based in part on previous deliberations and decisions on one particular form of geoengineering, ocean iron fertilization, which also is regulated under the London Convention. Those decisions were negotiated and agreed in painstaking process, with each word and its implications carefully weighed in the balance.1 Obviously, there is much need to specify exactly what is geoengineering and, thus, subject to the moratorium or any other legal ruling.
For most people, it seems intuitively clear that, for example, spewing sulphate aerosols into the atmosphere – a technology in the category of “solar radiation management” (SRM) clearly would be considered “geoengineering.” We would not consider doing that for any other reason or intent – there are known anticipated serious risks and dangers, etc.
But the distinction is much less clear for other technologies. For example, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), large scale afforestation/reforestation, or biochar – these approaches mostly involve using plant biomass and “biosequestration” and fall into the category of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. They differ in that these technologies also are discussed under the framework of mitigation and adaptation – promoted as beneficial even at smaller scales (arguably). Many view these as less risky and more easily scalable approaches.
Scale, Intent and Perception
Definition debates have swirled around the importance of scale. For example, planting a few hectares of trees might not be considered geoengineering by most people, but planting a million hectares perhaps would. Especially if those involved vast monocultures of trees genetically engineered and planted specifically to store carbon (for example). Yet if those same million hectares were replanted to restore native forests, most would not consider that geoengineering.
Debates also have swirled around the issue of “intention”: Is the intent to reduce global greenhouse gas concentrations? Or something else, say offsetting emissions from a facility or an industrial sector or some other source of emissions. Would agroecological farming methods be geoengineering if the farmer is motivated by his understanding of carbon sequestration, but not if his intent were simply to produce decent food? How can “intent” be determined accurately?
Some goengineering advocates have argued the terminology is meaningless because we humans have long been intentionally altering the global atmosphere, so why come up with a new term? This argument falls along the lines that we already have messed things up so badly that we shouldn’t get into a fuss over whether to engage in something that seems potentially likely to mess them up more.
Others, such as James Fleming (author of Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control“), argue that requiring “intent” as a condition of the definition is slippery because there are plenty of “non climate” reasons that could be used to argue for the use of some geoengineering technologies (military, food security, etc). There are, as well, technologies that involve global-scale “tweaks,” but to non-climate systems (e.g. manipulation of nitrogen or water cycles).2
The definition debates also have swirled around making climate geoengineering sound more appealing to a public that is clearly repulsed by the idea. That repulsion was articulated humorously by Stephen Colbert in his recent interview with David Keith, and again by Al Gore, who referred to it as “insane, utterly mad and delusional,” and yet again by a recent survey study that concluded in an understated manner; “overall public evaluation of climate engineering is negative.”
Aware of these poor ratings, the term “soft geoengineering” was introduced by the conservative American Enterprise Institute. It states: “In environmental issues, even more than most public policy questions, perception matters. That is why ‘soft’ geoengineering techniques – less ambitious, less disruptive, and less threatening approaches – are important; they get people used to the basic concepts of geoengineering without scaring them. And in so doing, they expand the scope of the climate policy discussionin important ways.”
Winning over public acceptance matters, and terminology is key: precisely why we need to be wary and monitor these word games.
Virtually every major meeting on the topic of climate geoengineering, it seems, has dedicated time to grappling with the definition. The Royal Society defined geoengineering as “the deliberate and large scale intervention in the Earth’s climatic system with the aim of reducing global warming.” That definition was adopted by others, for example, including the US Government Accountability Office 2011 report. At the Asilomar conference in 2010, the term “climate intervention” was offered up as a more palatable term than geoengineering. The Bipartisan Policy Center then offered up “climate remediation,” defined as “intentional actions taken to counter the climate effects of past greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere” (mitigation referring to actions to reduce future emissions). About this, Jeff Goodell (quoted by Joe Romm) states: “The phrase ‘climate remediation’ is almost as bad as the phrase ‘clean coal.’ In both cases, it’s a phrase that reeks of spin and marketing. And while I can understand why Big Coal wants to push it, I think it was a mistake for this panel to choose this phrase. The idea, of course, is to make geoengineering – or, if you must, climate engineering – sound gentle and comforting. It is not gentle and comforting, it is a big, complex, morally fraught and dangerous idea, and attempts to disguise this with cuddly language are just going to backfire.”
The Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative (SRMGI) offers that “SRM” could just as well refer to “sunlight reflection methods.” Certainly far more cuddly.3
Informally, some very hopeful advocates of geoengineering have even argued that the term “ecological restoration” should be used instead of “climate geoengineering.”
The 2012 IPCC Working Group 1 report described geoengineering in the glossary as follows: “Geoengineering refers to a broad set of methods and technologies that aim to deliberately alter the climate system in order to alleviate the impacts of climate change. Most, but not all, methods seek to either (a) reduce the amount of absorbed solar energy in the climate system (Solar Radiation Management) or (b) increase net carbon sinks from the atmosphere at a scale sufficiently large to alter climate (Carbon Dioxide Removal). Scale and intent are of central importance. Two key characteristics of geoengineering methods of particular concern are that they use or affect the climate system (e.g., atmosphere, land or ocean) globally or regionally and/or could have substantive unintended effects that cross national boundaries. Geoengineering is different from weather modification and ecological engineering, but the boundary can be fuzzy.”
It is notable that it mentions “unintended effects that cross national boundaries” and “use or affect the climate system globally or regionally.” Including terminology regarding transboundary effects is both sensible and nonsensical. On the one hand, it highlights the fact that some approaches are likely to have differential impacts in different regions, raising the potential for quite serious geopolitical concerns and divergent interests. At the same time, the global atmosphere knows no boundaries, even if international laws do.
Implementation of some technologies likely would have immediate and direct, or eventual and direct transboundary effects. And then we can ask: Were they intended or unintended? How can that be known? What will the sociopolitical ramifications be? As Jim Thomas from ETC Group points out, this condition regarding transboundary impacts could lead to a case where fertilizing Lake Baikal would not be geoengineering, but fertilizing Lake Malawi would be.
A “thought experiment” here is useful: What if Canada decided to engage in very large-scale biochar or BECCS program, in the process wreaking havoc on their forests and biodiversity. Most international law would not consider that a transboundary concern – as they currently do not consider Canada’s high rate of deforestation to be any sort of treaty violation. Yet Canada could be considered to be in breach of the Convention on Biological Diversity geoengineering moratorium, because that is, in fact, conditional on biodiversity impacts.
What About Weather?
Regarding the issue of weather modification, IPCC correctly indicates the boundaries are fuzzy. A history of research and practice on weather modification already exists, derived in part from military research and development where the ability to stimulate rainfall in particular was found useful to hindering opposing forces in the Vietnam War. Startling and disturbing though it may be, one can today simply google “Weather Modification Incorporated” and find commercial services available (“When most people look up they see clouds. We see potential”). The weather modification industry has its own association and a dedicated journal. Most of its attention is focused on cloud seeding; ETC Group has included it in its rundown of geoengineering technologies – and Fleming similarly supports its inclusion. If weather modification is geoengineering, then we already are engaged. Even now it is becoming a last resort for regions such as the western United States, where drought conditions are severe and worsening.
Example of Media Propaganda?-Changes in Jet Streams Might Lead to Harsher Winters, Researchers Say!-Posted On Nature World News-By Staff Reporter-On February 17, 2014:
Climate Engineering Weather Warfare, and the Collapse of Civilization!-Posted on geoengineeringwatch.org-By Staff-On January 31, 2014:
Geoengineered Snowstorms – THE SNOWMEN Turning Warmth Into Winter (Part 1)!-Posted ongeoengineeringwatch.org-On January 28, 2014:
Geoengineered Snowstorms – THE SNOWMEN Turning Warmth Into Winter (Part 2)!-Posted ongeoengineeringwatch.org-On January 28, 2014:
Video: Jeff Rense & Dane Wigington – Snow Burns, Won’t Melt!-Posted on geoengineeringwatch.org-On February 11, 2014:
Audio: The Secret Teachings!-Posted ongeoengineeringwatch.org-On January 27, 2014:
Weekly Geoengineering Update January 19, 2014!-Posted ongeoengineeringwatch.org-On January 20, 2014:
CHEMTRAILS: Covert Crimes Against Humanity!-Posted ongeoengineeringwatch.org-On January 15, 2014:
Video: Affecting Everyone Planet Wide: Blowing The Whistle on Geoengineering with Kristen Meghan!-Posted on YouTube.com-By UniBrowStudioVision-On January 21, 2014:
Video: Ex-Military Industrial Environmental Hygienist Kristen Meghan Blows Whistle On Air Force Chemtrails!-Posted on YouTube.com-By UniBrowStudioVision-On April 10, 2013:
Video: Former Air Force Industrial Hygienist Confirms Geoengineering / Chemtrail Reality!-Posted on geoengineeringwatch.org-On January 10, 2013:
Video: Purpose of Chemtrails w/ AC Griffith and all NEW 2010 Video Captures!-Posted on YouTube.com-By kenjams-On April 14, 2010:
Video: BREAKING CHEMTRAIL SCIENTIST MURDERED AFTER GOING ON NATIONAL RADIO!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Mu2143k-On July 24, 2013:
Video: Irrefutable Truth. U.S. Military intentionally poisoning us with Biologicals!-Posted on YouTube.com-By SuperDeltaBravo1-On November 28, 2012:
Video: I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY - Dr Robert Gallo!-Posted on YouTube.com-Byyouxsearch-On December 2, 2011:
Video: Dr. Leonard Horowitz-Emerging Viruses, AIDS, & Ebola Nature. Accident or Intentional!-Posted on YouTube.com-ByOmar Zaid-On September 3, 2012:
Video: AIDS was manufactured by the Government - Dr. Len Horowitz!-Posted on YouTube.com-By freedomlawschool·-On June 11, 2011:
Video: In Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood and Bioterrorism (Full Length Documentary)!-Posted on YouTube.com-Bymystic1dave-On May 12, 2012:
What Chemtrails Are Doing To Your Brain - Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock Reveals Shocking Facts!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Russell Blaylock M.D-On April 7, 2013:
Video: Dr. Russell Blaylock-Nutrition and the Illuminati Agenda!-Posted on YouTube.com-By RobinMFisher-On July 26, 2012:
Geoengineered Weather Patterns Wreaking Havoc Across The Planet!-Posted on geoengineeringwatch.org-On February 15, 2014:
Senate DEMS Attempt To Bully Networks Into Covering Climate Change!-Posted on Independent Journal Review-ByCaroline Schaeffer-On February 18, 2014:
Obama Turns Attention To California’s Worst Drought In 100 Years!-Posted on The Sacramento Bee-By the Editorial Board-On February 17, 2014:
Video: Charles Krauthammer Destroys Global Warming Myths in 89 Seconds!-Posted on The Foundry-By Todd Thurman-On February 18, 2014:
No Federal Water for California Farmers, Either!-Posted on Big Government-By JOEL B. POLLAK-On February 21, 2014:
Surge in babies born without brains in Washington State!-Posted on Natural News-By J. D. Heyes-On March 5, 2014:
Which parts of America are the most contaminated with arsenic?-Posted on Natural News-By Ethan A. Huff, staff writer-On March 5, 2014:
Ignorance and Cronyism Are the Only Settled Sciences!-Posted on Rightwing News-By Derek Hunter-On April 28, 2014:
Video: BUSTED Pilot Forgets To Turn Off CHEMTRAILS while landing!-Posted on YourTubeNews.ning-By Turner Radio Network-On April 27, 2014:
Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison: 571 tons of toxic lead ‘chemtrailed’ into America’s skies every year!-Posted on Natural News-By Mike Adams, the Health Ranger-On June 13, 2014:
OBAMA SCORCHED FOR ‘U.S. MEDICAL GENOCIDE’: ‘Michael Savage, others unleash on ‘reckless’ illegals’ policy’!-Posted on WND.com-By BOB UNRUH-On February 4, 2015:
HOW VACCINE HYSTERIA COULD SPARK TOTALITARIAN NIGHTMARE: ‘Exclusive: Lee Hieb, M.D., shares ‘dirty little secret’ immunization pushers don’t reveal’!-Posted on WND.com-By LEE HIEB, M.D.-On February 4, 2015:
UN Plan for 2015 Climate Summit Would Shackle Planet With Energy Restrictions!-Posted on The New American-By William F. Jasper-On February 16, 2015:
FINALLY THEY ADMIT THE GOAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE IS TO DESTROY CAPITALISM!-Posted on Land And Livestock International, Inc.-On March 8, 2015:
Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on No We Won’t-By Jake Martinez on March 7, 2015:
Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich regarding climate change (re: effects of toxins found in groundwater and soils)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 7, 2014:
Letter to our NM Governor Susana Martinez regarding climate change (re: effects of toxins found in groundwater and soils)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 7, 2014:
Letter to our NM Governor Martinez regarding climate change!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 18, 2014:
Response From and To Our NM U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich Regarding Climate Change!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 16, 2014:
How “climate change” is supposedly impacting New Mexico and other southwestern states because of ensuing drought and devastating wildfires!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-ByJake Martinez-On February 10, 2014:
Fuku Warning! US Gov’t Orders 14 Million Doses Of Potassium Iodide!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 2, 2014:
New EPA Land Grab, Complete Control Over All Private Land in America! (Part 1)
An Open Letter To Communist Valerie Jarrett!
GENERAL CEMENTS PLAN TO END OBAMA’S REIGN: ‘Working in Washington now to implement radical solution’!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 6, 2014:
A Republic, If You Can Keep It!
The Fightin Side of Me!
When Injustice Becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty!
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy website and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide:
“Food For Thought”
Hello: When Are Americans Going To Wake Up?-God Bless America!